|
Management
Management Plan
A Management Plan 2005-2010 has been prepared for inclusion
in the nomination to UNESCO. The Management Plan follows an accepted
format beginning by establishing a Vision for the World Heritage Site,
followed by a series of aims, objectives and actions in pursuit of this
Vision:The Management Plan expands on issues covered briefly in the
Nomination Document and will provide a handbook for the Partners.
|
|
We
believe that by protecting, conserving and enhancing the universal value
of the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World heritage Site it
will reinforce cultural distinctiveness, and beccome a significant
driver for economic regeneration and social inclusion |
Ownership
The Cornish Mining World Heritage Nominated Site extends
across 19,808 hectares and with it a variety of ownerships both public
and private, large and small scale. A proportion (8.4%) of the nominated
Site is in the ownership of local authorities and the National Trust. |
| Land Owner |
Area (ha) |
|
Carrick District Council |
75 |
| Caradon District
Council |
8 |
|
Cornwall County Council |
354 |
| Devon County Council |
2 |
|
Kerrier District Council |
89 |
| National Trust |
1055 |
|
North Cornwall District Council |
0 |
| Penwith District
Council |
11 |
|
Restormel Borough Council |
88 |
| Tavistock Town Council |
5 |
| West
Devon Borough Council |
2 |
| Total |
1671 (8.4% of nominated site)
|
|
|
A proportion (8.6%) of the nominated Site is owned and managed by large
private estates (including the Duchy of Cornwall, the Tregothnan Estate, the St. Levan Estate, the Bolitho Estate, the
Godolphin Estate, the Bradford Estate, the Williams Estate and the
Clowance Estate), and a series of trusts and charities including the
Charlestown Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Cornwall
Wildlife Trust, Woodland Trust and Cornwall Heritage Trust. Collectively
these organisations own many of the significant components within the
nominated Site. By far the largest ownership (83%)
within the nominated Site is made up of small scale private ownership.
The Management Plan will need to ensure that all owners within the
proposed World Heritage Site have access to information, can participate
and benefit. Public bodies should set exemplary standards and a
commitment to conservation, sustainable development and public access. |
|
 |
|
Legal Status
The United Kingdom is party to
the World Heritage Convention, although World Heritage Sites do not have
statutory protection within the United Kingdom. Cornwall and West Devon
contain many statutory designations of European and United Kingdom basis
for natural, historic and landscape importance. Some of these
designations incidentally include parts of the Cornish Mining nominated
Site and may provide some indirect protection. Other designations have
been specifically applied to protect historic mining sites and broader
built landscapes.
AONB
Cornwall Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty was designated in
1959 and covers 12 distinct areas comprising 958 sq km. The Tamar Valley
Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty was designated in 1995 and is split
into two areas (Tamar-Tavy area and the Lynher area) covering 190 sq km.
Scheduled Monuments
Under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, 148
Scheduled Monuments have been designated within the nominated Site. At
the commencement of the World Heritage Site Bid a commitment was made by
the English Heritage Monuments Protection Programme to prioritise the
scheduling of mine sites and mine related structures within the proposed
Bid areas in Cornwall and West Devon. A shortlist of local sites has
been compiled which targets those of greatest national importance that
are most under threat from neglect or development pressures. Twenty
sites have been considered since May 2003, and scheduling proposals
recently submitted include the Robinson’s Shaft complex at South Crofty,
Geevor Mine in Pendeen, the East Pool Whim and Taylor’s Shaft engines at
Pool, and the New Sump Shaft complex at Dolcoath in Pengegon. Others
that have been deferred pending the completion of site consolidation
works include the Botallack Mine and calciner, and the Kenidjack Arsenic
Works.
Listed Buildings
There are 358 Listed Buildings designated under the Planning
(Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, within the nominated
Site that are recorded within the listing description to have been
directly linked to mining or an associated industry or activity.
Registered Parks & Gardens
The national Register of Parks and Gardens of Special
Historic Interest maintained by English Heritage includes three gardens
within the nominated Site at Godolphin, Carclew and Cotehele.
Conservation Areas
33 Conservation Areas have been designated locally under the
Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 principally
around historic mining settlements to protect and conserve their special
character and interest. The
Cornwall Industrial Settlements Initiative has resulted in proposals
for additional and amended Conservation Areas within 29 mining
settlements, which are being implemented as resources allow.
There are several designations for the natural
environment within the nominated Site which include Sites of Special
Scientific Interest (SSSI), European Special Area of Conservation (SAC),
candidate SAC, Wildlife Trust sites, National Nature Reserves, Local
Nature Reserves, Heritage Coast and Regionally Important Geological
Sites (RIGS). These designations range in importance from European,
national and local, and provide indirect protection to the nominated
Site. Two of these are particularly relevant to the protection of the
nominated Site:
SSSIs
There are 26 Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)
within the nominated Site some of whose special interest leading to
designation is based on their mineralogical value. For example there are
two SSSIs within the Tamar Valley Bid area whose special interest is
based on the minerals which are to be found on the old spoil dumps.
Where SSSIs have been designated in relation to the historic mining
landscape their statutory protection contributes directly to the
nominated Site.
RIGS
Regionally Important Geological/Geomorphological Sites (RIGS)
are sites of geological or geomorphological interest (excluding sites of
national importance designated Sites of Special Scientific Interest),
that are considered worthy of protection for their education, research,
historical or aesthetic importance. These sites display evidence for the
earth’s formation and transformation through rocks, minerals, fossils
and landforms. Few areas within the United Kingdom contain a comparable
wealth of geological heritage as Cornwall and West Devon. RIGS are
selected by the Cornwall and Devon RIGS Groups. There are 23 RIGS within
the nominated Site in Cornwall. As a result of recent survey work, eight
RIGS have been identified within the Devon section of the nominated
Site, six of which are mine sites. Protection for RIGS comes through
policies in both the Cornwall and Devon Mineral Plans.
Legislative framework
An established framework of legislation and planning
policy exists within which the management of the World Heritage Site
will take place. This framework stems from European Union, United
Kingdom national, regional and local government. Supporting the
statutory system are conventions, codes of practice and guidance. Some
of these protective measures are administered by United Kingdom national
government and some by local authorities.
International
The World Heritage Convention
(adopted by UNESCO in 1972) was ratified by
the United Kingdom in 1984. The Convention provides for the
identification, protection, conservation and presentation of cultural
and natural sites of outstanding universal value, and requires a
World Heritage List to be established under the management of an
inter-governmental World Heritage Committee. Under the terms of the
Convention the United Kingdom makes an annual contribution to the
UNESCO’s World Heritage Fund which helps to protect World Heritage Sites
in danger, usually in the Third World or war-affected countries.
Implementation of the World Heritage Convention is overseen by UNESCO’s
World Heritage Committee. The United Kingdom Government was successful
in gaining election to the World Heritage Committee in October 2001, for
the first time, for a four year term. The Department for Culture, Media
and Sport is responsible for the United Kingdom’s general compliance
with the Convention, and for nominating sites in England.
The Valetta Convention
In order to better understand and protect the common historic heritage
of Europe, the member States of the Council of Europe and the other
States party to the European Cultural Convention signatory drew up the
Valetta Convention (The European Convention on the Protection of the
Archaeological Heritage (Revised)) in 1992. The convention consists of
18 Articles which define the common archaeological heritage, set out
measures for its protection, guarantee the scientific significance of
archaeological research work, provide for public financial support for
archaeological research, encourage the dissemination of the results of
that research, promote awareness of the importance of the historic
heritage, seek to prevent the illicit circulation of artefacts and
encourage international co-operation and scientific assistance. The
Convention stresses the agreement of the member states that the
archaeological heritage was both essential to a knowledge of the history
of mankind and at the same time increasingly at risk. It identified a
need for the protection of the archaeological heritage to be reflected
in town and country planning and cultural development policies.
The Nara Document on Authenticity
builds on the Charter of Venice, 1964 and recognises that in
a world undergoing increasing globalisation and homogenisation the
search for cultural identify can sometimes be pursued through aggressive
nationalism and the suppression of the cultures of minorities. All
cultures and societies are rooted in tangible and intangible expression
which constitute their heritage and these should be respected. It is
essential that authenticity is achieved in conservation practice to
illuminate the collective memory of humanity.
European Union Directive on the
management of waste from the extractive industries. In 2003
the European Commission adopted a proposal for an EU Directive on the
management of waste from the extractive industries (i.e. mining and
quarrying). The proposal seeks to prevent or reduce, as far as possible,
any adverse effects on the environment, and any resultant risks to human
health, brought about as a result of the management of waste from the
extractive industries. One element of this Directive may be the need to
compile an inventory of sites, although the Directive appears to be
directed to new mining sites rather than past or historic sites provided
there is no danger to health. Concerns about the possible effects of the
Directive on the historic environment have been raised by English
Heritage with representatives in the United Kingdom government who are
currently assessing its impact.
National Legislation
The Ancient Monuments and
Archaeological Areas Act 1979
provides the statutory framework under which
a schedule of archaeological and historical monuments deemed to be of
national importance is established and maintained, as well as the basis
for protecting these sites and controlling works to them through a
formal system of Scheduled Monument Consent. English Heritage are the
agency who deliver advice to the Department of Culture, Media and Sport
on the inclusion of sites on the schedule and the granting of consents.
The Planning (Listed Buildings and
Conservation Areas) Act 1990
Listed Buildings: under this legislation the government
maintains a list of buildings of special architectural or historic
interest, and operates a Listed Building Consent process to control
works which affect them.
Conservation Areas: under
this legislation local authorities can designate areas of historical or
architectural importance. The legislation places a duty on local
planning authorities to identify the special qualities and formulate
proposals for the conservation and enhancement of Conservation Areas,
informally known as Conservation Area Statements.
The Town and Country Planning Act
1990 require planning authorities to have regard to
environmental considerations, including those relating to the historic,
natural and cultural heritage in preparing their Development Plan
policies and proposals ( Planning
and Compensation Act 1990).
The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
resulted from the United Kingdom governments’
Planning Green Paper 2001 and
modernises the development plan system by introducing Regional Spatial
Strategies, Local Development Frameworks and abolishing Structure Plans.
Local Development Frameworks will relate to Local Community Strategies
and contain the core spatial strategy. They will be supported by a
portfolio of documents including Area Action Plans for those areas with
significant regeneration or conservation needs, and non-statutory
Supplementary Planning Documents.
The Town and Country Planning
(General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (GPDO): permitted
development rights allow certain types of minor and uncontentious
development to proceed without the need for a planning application,
since planning permission for them is deemed to be granted. Under the
GPDO, Article 4 Directions can be issued by the local planning authority
to restrict some permitted development rights, and are typically used to
control minor alterations in Conservation Areas. Article 7 Directions
allow the mineral planning authority to remove permitted development
rights for removal of mineral working deposits where it is on land
within an AONB or site of archaeological interest. However, the payment
of compensation hampers the use of this power. The United Kingdom
government has recently commissioned a study (Nathaniel Lichfield 2003)
into the effectiveness of the GPDO.
Town and Country Planning
(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 1999
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a procedure that must be
followed for certain types of development before they are granted
development consent. The requirement for EIA comes from a European
Directive and the procedure requires the developer to compile an
Environmental Statement (ES) describing the likely significant effects
of the development on the environment and proposed mitigation measures.
The need for an ES, or whether the proposed development is deemed to
fall within the Schedules triggering ES, is determined by a Screening
Opinion sought from the Local Planning Authority or other competent
authority. The content is agreed under a Scoping Opinion sought from the
Local Planning Authority. It is common for the impact on historic
environment to be examined by an ES. The ES must be circulated to
statutory consultation bodies and made available to the public for
comment. Its contents, together with any comments, must be taken into
account by the competent authority before it may grant consent.
The National Parks and Access to
the Countryside Act 1949 established procedure for the
creation of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). This was
strengthened by The Countryside and Rights of
Way Act (CROW) 2000, which intended to facilitate greater
public access to the countryside, including placing a duty on local
authorities to produce management plans for AONBs and the local
authority’s duty to establish an independent Local Access Forum (LAF)
that will advise a county council on its Rights of Way Improvement
Plans.
National Guidance
Guidance on government planning policy is contained in a
series of Planning Policy Guidance Notes, now being superseded by
Planning Policy Statements. Guidance on the proposed new Regional
Spatial Strategies is given in draft PPS11.
Guidance on the proposed new Local Development Frameworks is given in
draft PPS12.
PPG 15 This guidance
provides a full statement of United Kingdom government policies for the
identification and protection of historic buildings, conservation areas,
and other elements of the historic environment, explains the role played
by the planning system in their protection and treatment as a material
consideration in development proposals. PPG15 complements the guidance
on archaeology and planning given in PPG16 to ensure effective
protection for all aspects of the historic environment, and encourages
local planning authorities to ensure that they have appropriately
qualified specialist advice on any development which, by its character
or location, might be held to have an adverse effect on the historic
environment. PPG15 specifically refers to World Heritage Site in
paragraphs 2.2.2-3 as follows:
-
2.2.2 No additional statutory controls follow from the
inclusion of a site in the World Heritage list. Inclusion does,
however, highlight the outstanding international importance of the
site as a key material consideration to be taken into account by local
planning authorities in determining planning and listed building
applications, and by the Secretary of State in determining cases on
appeal following call-in.
-
2.2.3 Each local authority concerned, taking account
of World Heritage Site designation and other relevant statutory
designations, should formulate specific planning policies for
protecting these sites and include these policies in their development
plans. Policies should reflect the fact that all these sites have been
designated for their outstanding universal value, and they should
place great weight on the need to protect them for the benefit of
future generations as well as our own. Development proposals affecting
these sites or their setting may be compatible with this objective,
but should always be carefully scrutinised for their likely effect on
the site or its setting in the longer term. Significant development
proposals affecting World Heritage Sites will generally require formal
environmental assessment, to ensure that their immediate impact and
their implications for the longer term are fully evaluated.
PPG 16 This guidance for planning authorities in
England, property owners, developers, archaeologists, amenity
societies and the general public sets out the United Kingdom
government’s policy on archaeological remains on land, and how they
should be a material consideration in the planning system. PPG16
establishes the policy of preservation in situ of nationally important
archaeological remains and applies the principle of polluter pays
where archaeological remains will be destroyed by new development. It
gives advice on the handling of archaeological remains and discoveries
under the development plan and development control systems including
the use of planning conditions, the requirement for developers to
provide adequate information on the impact of proposals on
archaeological remains, and to arrange for recording and publication
in mitigation.
Register of Parks and Gardens of
Special Historic
Interest: Parks and Gardens included within this national
register maintained by English Heritage are not subject to additional
statutory controls. However PPG15 guides planning authorities to take
account of the need to protect registered parks and gardens when
preparing development plans and in determining planning applications.
The Register acts as guidance to local authorities on those parks and
gardens deemed to be of national importance and most needy of
protection.
National Reviews
The Historic Environment: A Force
for Our Future 2001 .
This document represents the UK Government’s response to English
Heritage’s report Power of
Place
and gives a clear commitment on the
importance of the historic environment. Covering the areas of education,
social inclusion, planning, conservation, regeneration and tourism, this
document sets out the agenda and 54 action points for Government,
English Heritage and the wider historic environment sector. This
document is a guide to the United Kingdom government’s position and an
indication of the roles that the historic environment should play in the
future. It also sets out a proposal to review heritage protection.
Protecting the Historic
Environment; Making the System Work
Better 2003. In July 2003 the government published a
consultation paper Protecting the
Historic Environment; making the system work better.
This paper proposes changes requiring primary legislation to bring
together the disparate mechanisms for protection under one single
combined List. This will include World Heritage Sites which currently
have no statutory basis in the United Kingdom, at a stroke bringing a
new level of protection to the proposed World Heritage Site. Following
public consultation, in June 2004 the government issued
Review of Heritage Protection; The Way
Forward
outlining a series of short term and long
term measures to bring about change. The World Heritage Site Office and
Partnership will need to be aware of any new legislation over the next 5
years and the implications for our Vision and Aims of increasing
protection.
Management Authority
The nominated site spans
several local authorities, government agencies and private estates with
a management interest and responsibility.
Level at which Management exercised
The Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World
Heritage Site Bid Partnership is comprised of representatives from 73
organisations that own, manage or have an operating interest in land
and/or property within the nominated Site areas. The Partnership’s remit
is to steer production of the Nomination Document and Management Plan
by:
-
acting as the first level of consultation with key
stakeholders
-
considering recommendations from the Area Panels and
Officer Working Group
-
receiving progress reports from the World Heritage
Site Bid Team and steering its activities
-
scrutinising bid documentation prior to wider
consultation
The Partnership established six Area Panels based on the
relevant District Council administrative areas in Cornwall and West
Devon to advise it on appropriate boundaries for the individual bid
areas. The Officer Working Group is comprised of staff from the local
authorities and other key organisations including the National Trust,
Cornwall and Tamar Valley AONBs and English Heritage, to oversee
production of the bid documentation on its behalf. Administrative and
treasury functions are provided by Cornwall County Council, which
co-ordinates the activities of the Partnership and employed the World
Heritage Site Bid team, and is establishing the World Heritage Site
Office. The Office will be responsible to the Partnership for delivery
of the bid documents and the implementation of the Management Plan on
its behalf. Its core management functions will be to co-ordinate action,
monitoring and evaluation across the proposed World Heritage Site and to
report the results to the Partnership. Should World Heritage Site
inscription be awarded, the composition and remit of the Bid Partnership
will be reviewed and developed to create the management structure most
appropriate for the effective implementation, monitoring and evaluation
of the Management Plan.
Agreed Plans
There are a range of agreed plans which relate to the
nominated Site directly or indirectly. These range from strategic
planning documents at regional, county and local level, through to
overarching strategies guiding community, economy, tourism, transport or
heritage.
All of these strategies are of relevance to the World
Heritage Site Vision and Aims. There are also management plans and
conservation plans for specific landscapes, monuments or projects, with
more to be carried out.
The World Heritage Site Office has been successful at
integrating the proposed World Heritage Site into many existing agreed
plans by way of planning consideration, economic contribution, tourism
strength, cultural significance and heritage asset. Opportunities are
being taken as they arise with the drafting of new plans to include
provision for the World Heritage Site in the most appropriate way.
An important example of this is the precedent
established with the Cornwall Structure Plan 2004 which made provision
in Policy 2 for the proposed World Heritage Site:
Policy 2 Character Areas, Design & Environmental
Protection
..The conservation and enhancement of sites, areas, or
interests, of recognised international or national importance for their
landscape, nature conservation, archaeological or historic importance,
including the proposed World Heritage Site, should be given priority in
the consideration of development proposals....


Sources and levels of finance
The ten bid areas comprising the nominated Site contain
many component landholdings and multiplicity of ownership. The capital
expenditure on nominated Site property by the major public and
charitable trust owners between 1998/9 and 2003/4 totals £26,599,440.
Projected capital spend in 2004/5 amounts to £7,797,011.
The revenue budgets for the most recent complete
financial year (2003/4) total £2,787,629, including expenditure on
operating costs of the property, ongoing repair, maintenance, staffing
and presentation (for visitor attractions facilities).
This level of investment is evidence of the high
priority placed on mining heritage by public authorities in Cornwall and
West Devon. The Management Plan will include further research to
identify the investment in mining heritage as a proportion of the total
spend on the heritage sector overall.
Sources of Expertise and Training in Conservation and
Management Techniques
The World Heritage Site Office and Bid Team is hosted
within the Environment and Heritage Service of Cornwall County Council.
The team has access to a range of skills and experience across the bid
Partnership.
The Environment and Heritage Service includes archives,
publicity, land management, bid development, project management and
historic environment.
The Historic Environment Team (formerly Cornwall
Archaeological Unit) is one of the largest most established of its type
in the United Kingdom and provides the following expertise to the World
Heritage Site Office:
-
County Archaeologist (Head of Historic Environment)
-
Projects Team includes Archaeologists with
considerable experience in identification and recording of mine sites
-
Historic Environment Record Team
-
Historic Environment Advice Team
-
National Mapping Programme Team
Over the past 20 years staff working for Cornwall County
Council, in partnership with colleagues across the local authorities and
other agencies including the National Trust, have been at the forefront
of developing skills and best practice for dealing with contaminated and
derelict land, conserving mine buildings, creating public access,
sourcing funding, recording archaeological remains, promoting
heritage-led regeneration, developing Geographical Information Systems
and other computer data systems. Cornwall County Council is an Investor
in People and all staff are provided with opportunity and encouragement
for continuing professional development and training.
Devon County Council has been at the forefront of
delivering benefits to the historic environment through agri-environment
schemes and has a well established programme of aerial reconnaissance.
The Historic Environment Team includes:
-
County Archaeologist
-
Historic Environment Record & Geographic Information
System staff
-
Development control and planning advice staff
-
Site management advice staff
-
Historic Landscape Characterisation Officer
-
Historic Buildings Officers
Expertise is also available from the 10 Conservation
Officers, Planning Officers, and staff with expertise in policy,
regeneration, countryside management and tourism marketing from all the
District Councils in the nominated Site. Expertise in the care and
management of World Heritage Sites, as well as strategic policy advice
on conservation and planning is available from English Heritage within
the Regional and National offices.
The Officer Working Group brings together
representatives from English Heritage, ICOMOS, the two County Councils,
seven District Councils and other agencies into a forum for discussion,
advice and guidance to the World Heritage Site Office.
The Bid Partnership provides the World Heritage Site Office
communication with a full range of interest groups and societies,
agencies and owners and the specialist knowledge and expertise each
hold. During the Bid,
Technical Panels have provided expertise in mining and
engineering history, mineralogy, marketing and promotion. Area Panels
have provided local knowledge during the drafting of the nominated Site
boundary.
Visitor facilities
The nominated Site comprises a series of landscapes
(Areas) that contain a distinctive and recurring pattern of buildings,
monuments and sites, some of which now offer specific visitor
facilities.
Mining Heritage visitor facilities within the nominated
Site areas can be broadly categorised as follows:
-
Heritage centres/museums interpreting multiple aspects
of nominated Site history and significance, providing a range of
visitor facilities including education services
-
Mine sites interpreted and operating as a visitor
attraction and providing a range of visitor facilties, including
education services
-
Mine Sites, accessible and with basic interpretation,
but no visitor facilities
-
Mineral and mine owners houses and gardens
-
Libraries and archives with mining related material
and collections
-
Mine landscapes with basic interpretation, served by
trails and footpaths
-
Mining towns and villages with basic interpretation
trails
-
Tourism Information Centres
There are numerous mining landscape related visitor
facilities across Cornwall and West Devon. There is a wide range in size and scope of
facility, with some attractions offering a more comprehensive
interpretation of mining heritage, while others specialising in a
particular aspect or feature.
Click here to view map of visitor attractions

Visitor statistics
An Economic Impact Assessment (EIA) was commissioned by
the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World Heritage Site Bid
Partnership in 2003 to:
It is estimated that in 2000 there were 870,000 visits
per year to the mining heritage visitor attractions and facilities in
Cornwall and West Devon. These were part of an overall estimated 739,000
staying visitors and 1,913,000 day visitors for whom mining heritage is
important in planning their visit, who are themselves a sub-set of the
estimated 6.7 million trips every year motivated by conserved
landscapes.
A more recent survey of mining heritage attractions and
interpreted landscapes within the nominated Site revealed that in 2003,
10 of these achieved a combined visitor total of over 460,000. In
estimating the potential impact on visitor numbers of inscription as a
World Heritage Site, the EIA identified that the ten nominated Site
areas fell into five broad categories. These differentiated between
those areas with the capacity to benefit from increased visitor activity
throughout the year, those where any growth should be targeted outside
the summer high season, areas where infrastructure development was
needed before the area could support greater visitor activity, and those
which were not well placed to seek growth in visitor numbers, either
because they were already at capacity or due to a lack of facilities.
The
EIA report concluded that, given the context of regional tourism
targets for growth between 1999 and 2010 (40%), there was potential for
a 10% increase in mining heritage related visits by 2007/8, subject to
the implementation of a 3 year, £500,000 marketing strategy commencing
in 2004.
Visitor Management Priorities
The World Heritage Site Bid Partnership Marketing
Strategy adopted in April 2004 has identified the following priorities
in relation to target audiences:
This mix of audiences best fits the strategic aims of
pursuing sustainable growth outside high season and generating economic
benefits whilst also ensuring that the social and cultural values of the
nominated Site contribute to present day community development
strategies.
A key visitor management policy priority is the
identification and development of "Key Centre" sites, which interpret
the character and significance of mining within a sub region of the
Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape, and act as a signpost to other
attractions and facilities within the nominated Site. Criteria for
identification of Key Centres will include:
-
authenticity of experience (including above ground
interpretation and underground mine visit)
-
capacity to serve substantially increased visitor
numbers without detriment to the site
-
relevance to a range of the mining landscape
components and multiple significances
-
significant existing educational usage, with potential
for growth
-
range of quality ancillary facilities such as café,
shop
The central Cornwall bid areas contain a number of
potential Key Centre candidates, although currently without the full
range of advantages listed above. The Management Plan includes an
options appraisal of each of these, with a view to identifying a further
candidate Key Centre for development.
|
|